Shocking & Dominant: Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats Revealed 2026
Introduction
If you follow the NBA closely, you already know how intense the Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks rivalry gets. These two Central Division opponents bring out the best and worst in each other every single time they step on the court. The 2025-26 season gave us two fascinating matchups between them, and the chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from both games tell a story you absolutely need to read.
The first game on February 4, 2026 saw Milwaukee dominate at home with a 131-115 victory. The second game on March 1, 2026 was a completely different story. Chicago turned the tables with a commanding 120-97 win at the United Center. Two games. Two totally different outcomes. The player stats from both nights reveal exactly what changed and who made the biggest impact.
In this article, you get a full breakdown of every key player’s numbers from both games, what those stats mean, and which storylines you need to follow the rest of this season. Whether you are a Bulls fan, a Bucks fan, or just a basketball lover, this one is for you.

Game 1 Recap: Milwaukee Bucks Win 131-115 (February 4, 2026)
The Bucks came out with serious firepower at Fiserv Forum. Milwaukee shot an impressive 51.5% from the field and an absolutely scorching 60.5% from three-point range. That three-point shooting was the story of the night. The Bucks made 23 of their 38 attempts from deep. You simply cannot win when your opponent shoots that well from downtown.
Chicago led briefly in the third quarter and even cut the deficit, but Milwaukee pulled away in the fourth quarter to seal the deal. The Bucks dominated the glass with 61 total rebounds compared to Chicago’s 52. Their bench contributed 45 points, which proved to be a massive factor. Chicago’s bench only mustered 30 points in response.
Looking at the chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from this game, the gap in three-point shooting and rebounding stands out immediately. Chicago tried hard but simply could not overcome those two areas.
Milwaukee Bucks Top Player Stats – Game 1
| Player | Pos | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | Other |
| Kyle Kuzma | F | 31 | 12/22 (54.5%) | 3/5 | 4/7 | 10 Reb, 6 Ast |
| Ryan Rollins | G | 21 | 8/21 (38.1%) | 5/8 | 0/0 | 7 Reb, 10 Ast |
| Pete Nance | F | 15 | 6/8 (75.0%) | 3/5 | 0/0 | 8 Reb, 2 Ast |
| Gary Trent Jr. | G | 15 | 5/9 (55.6%) | 5/8 | 0/0 | 1 Reb, 0 Ast |
| Myles Turner | C | 15 | 5/10 (50.0%) | 2/3 | 3/4 | 4 Reb, 1 Ast |
| Jericho Sims | C | 9 | 4/6 (66.7%) | 0/0 | 1/2 | 9 Reb, 2 Ast |
Kyle Kuzma was the clear standout for Milwaukee. He poured in 31 points on 12-of-22 shooting while also grabbing 10 rebounds and dishing out 6 assists. That is a complete performance. His double-double anchored the Bucks offensively and made life very difficult for Chicago’s defense.
Ryan Rollins also had an impressive night with 21 points and 10 assists, recording a double-double of his own. He controlled the pace of the game and made the right decisions when Milwaukee needed them most. Pete Nance and Gary Trent Jr. each chipped in 15 points, giving Milwaukee four players in double figures from the start.
Chicago Bulls Top Player Stats – Game 1
| Player | Pos | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | Other |
| Coby White | G | 21 | 7/17 (41.2%) | 2/8 | 5/7 | 10 Reb, 3 Ast |
| Matas Buzelis | F | 22 | 8/16 (50.0%) | 5/10 | 1/3 | 2 Reb, 1 Ast |
| Ayo Dosunmu | G | 17 | 6/12 (50.0%) | 3/6 | 2/2 | 4 Reb, 8 Ast |
| Jalen Smith | C | 16 | 5/7 (71.4%) | 3/5 | 3/3 | 5 Reb, 1 Ast |
| Isaac Okoro | F | 9 | 3/10 (30.0%) | 1/6 | 2/2 | 2 Reb, 2 Ast |
| Yuki Kawamura | G | 5 | 1/5 (20.0%) | 1/5 | 2/2 | 5 Reb, 7 Ast |
Matas Buzelis led Chicago with 22 points and shot 50% from three-point range. He was one of the few bright spots for the Bulls on a tough night. Coby White added 21 points and pulled down 10 rebounds for a double-double of his own. Ayo Dosunmu contributed 17 points and 8 assists and kept the Bulls competitive in the middle quarters.
Unfortunately for Chicago, the rest of the lineup struggled. Yuki Kawamura shot just 20% from the field and finished with only 5 points. The Bulls shot 37.3% from three overall, which compared poorly to Milwaukee’s sizzling 60.5%. That gap in shooting efficiency explains the 16-point final margin better than anything else.
Game 2 Recap: Chicago Bulls Win 120-97 (March 1, 2026)
Chicago came into this rematch at home hungry for revenge, and they delivered in emphatic fashion. The Bulls dominated this game from the third quarter onward. After trailing 66-51 at halftime, Chicago outscored Milwaukee 36-23 in the third quarter and then absolutely destroyed them 33-8 in the fourth. That 27-point fourth quarter run was the defining moment of this game.
The chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from this game show a completely different Bulls team. Chicago shot 51.2% from the field, grabbed 57 rebounds, racked up 14 steals, and scored 22 fast break points. Their defense was suffocating. Milwaukee managed just 36.8% shooting from the field and an ugly 28.3% from three-point range.
Chicago’s bench outscored Milwaukee’s bench 48 to 45. Every rotation player stepped up. The Bulls scored 20 points off turnovers compared to Milwaukee’s 14. That kind of active, disruptive defense is what separates good teams from great ones.
Chicago Bulls Top Player Stats – Game 2
| Player | Pos | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | Other |
| Collin Sexton | G | 22 | 9/14 (64.3%) | 3/8 | 1/1 | 3 Reb, 2 Ast |
| Leonard Miller | F | 15 | 6/8 (75.0%) | 2/4 | 1/1 | 5 Reb, 4 Ast |
| Tre Jones | G | 13 | 4/9 (44.4%) | 1/3 | 4/4 | 3 Reb, 6 Ast |
| Nick Richards | C | 11 | 5/9 (55.6%) | 0/1 | 1/4 | 7 Reb, 0 Ast |
| Isaac Okoro | F | 7 | 2/5 (40.0%) | 1/4 | 2/4 | 4 Reb, 3 Ast |
Collin Sexton was exceptional in this victory. He scored 22 points on 9-of-14 shooting and hit three from three-point range while also grabbing 3 steals. His efficiency was stunning with a true shooting percentage of 76.2%. He set the tone from the opening tip and never let his foot off the gas.
Leonard Miller turned in one of the most efficient games you will see all season. He scored 15 points on 6-of-8 shooting, shot 50% from three, grabbed 5 rebounds, dished 4 assists, and added 2 blocks. His offensive rating for the night was an almost unreal 163.7. He was everywhere on both ends of the floor.
Tre Jones ran the offense beautifully with 13 points and 6 assists. Nick Richards controlled the paint with 11 points and 7 rebounds. The depth of Chicago’s contribution in this game was remarkable and speaks to how far this team has come.
Milwaukee Bucks Top Player Stats – Game 2
| Player | Pos | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | Other |
| Bobby Portis | F | 18 | 7/14 (50.0%) | 3/8 | 1/1 | 5 Reb, 0 Ast |
| Cam Thomas | G | 15 | 3/11 (27.3%) | 1/4 | 8/10 | 1 Reb, 3 Ast |
| AJ Green | F | 13 | 4/11 (36.4%) | 4/11 | 1/1 | 2 Reb, 2 Ast |
| Kevin Porter Jr. | G | 10 | 4/16 (25.0%) | 0/1 | 2/2 | 6 Reb, 4 Ast |
| Kyle Kuzma | F | 10 | 4/5 (80.0%) | 0/1 | 2/3 | 3 Reb, 4 Ast |
| Myles Turner | C | 8 | 3/10 (30.0%) | 2/5 | 0/0 | 7 Reb, 0 Ast |
Bobby Portis was Milwaukee’s best player in this game with 18 points on 50% shooting. He also grabbed 5 rebounds and made some tough shots. Cam Thomas added 15 points but needed 10 free throws to get there, converting 8 of them while shooting just 27.3% from the field. AJ Green contributed 13 points from three-point range.
The bigger story for Milwaukee was the players who struggled. Kevin Porter Jr. shot just 25% from the field on 16 attempts and finished with 10 points while going minus-23. Kyle Kuzma, who had dominated Game 1 with 31 points, was held to just 10 in this rematch. Chicago’s defense made his night very uncomfortable. Myles Turner also disappointed with just 8 points on 30% shooting.

Head-to-Head Team Stats Comparison
When you look at the chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats across both games, the team stat comparison tells the whole story of how each team won their respective game.
| Stat | MIL (Game 1) | CHI (Game 2) |
| Field Goal % | 51.5% | 51.2% |
| 3PT % | 60.5% | 36.7% |
| Total Rebounds | 61 | 57 |
| Assists | 33 | 34 |
| Steals | 6 | 14 |
| Blocks | 4 | 8 |
| Points in Paint | 46 | 50 |
| Fast Break Pts | 13 | 22 |
| Points Off Turnovers | 14 | 20 |
| Bench Points | 45 | 48 |
The most striking difference is in steals and fast break points. Chicago held a massive edge in Game 2 with 14 steals versus Milwaukee’s 9 in Game 1. Fast break points also heavily favored Chicago in their win with 22 compared to Milwaukee’s 13 in theirs. Transition offense is becoming a genuine weapon for the Bulls.
Key Storylines From the Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks Matches
Kyle Kuzma’s Dominance Fades in the Rematch
Kuzma’s performance swing is one of the most interesting storylines in these chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats. He dominated Game 1 with 31 points, 10 rebounds, and 6 assists. Then Chicago’s coaching staff made adjustments and held him to just 10 points in the rematch. That kind of game-to-game adjustment is the mark of a well-coached team.
Collin Sexton Emerges as a Reliable Scorer
Sexton’s 22-point, 64.3% shooting night in Game 2 announced his presence as a legitimate offensive weapon for Chicago. He showed the ability to score in multiple ways. He got to the rim, he knocked down threes, and he converted at the free throw line. Watch for him to be a major factor in big games the rest of this season.
Matas Buzelis Shows Promise for Chicago
The young forward scored 22 points in Game 1 and shot 50% from three-point range. His shooting ability and athleticism make him one of the most exciting young players in these chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats discussions. He has not fully arrived yet, but the talent is clearly there.
Milwaukee’s Three-Point Shooting Swings Are Alarming
Going from 60.5% in Game 1 to 28.3% in Game 2 represents a massive variance in three-point shooting for the Bucks. When they are hot, they are nearly unbeatable. When they are cold, they struggle to generate enough offense to compete. That kind of inconsistency will hurt them in the playoffs if they cannot solve it.
Chicago’s Defense Becomes Elite in Game 2
The Bulls held Milwaukee to just 8 points in the entire fourth quarter of Game 2. That is stifling, game-changing defense. Chicago’s 14 steals led directly to 20 points off turnovers. Their defensive rating of 87.8 in Game 2 was elite level. If the Bulls can replicate that kind of defensive intensity consistently, they become a genuine threat in the Eastern Conference.
What These Stats Mean Going Forward
The chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from this season reveal a fascinating competitive balance between these two teams. Neither team dominated both games. Each team showed it can win convincingly when everything clicks. That makes their future matchups must-watch television.
For Chicago, the emergence of Sexton and Miller as reliable contributors alongside Coby White gives the Bulls a three-headed offensive attack that is genuinely hard to defend. Add Dosunmu’s playmaking and Buzelis’s shooting, and you have a well-rounded roster. The defensive intensity shown in Game 2 needs to become the standard, not the exception.
For Milwaukee, the reliance on explosive three-point shooting is both their greatest strength and their greatest weakness. When Kuzma, Trent Jr., and Rollins are all hitting from deep, they are nearly impossible to stop. When they are cold, the offense stalls. Finding a more consistent interior scoring option would make them much harder to game plan against.
- Chicago’s fast break offense is becoming a genuine weapon this season.
- Milwaukee’s bench depth keeps them competitive even when starters struggle.
- Coby White’s rebounding (10 in Game 1) adds a dimension opponents do not always prepare for.
- Leonard Miller’s efficiency numbers suggest a player on the verge of a major breakout.
- Ryan Rollins running the offense gave Milwaukee a different dynamic in their Game 1 win.
Conclusion
The chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from the 2025-26 season tell the story of two very competitive teams heading in interesting directions. Milwaukee showed they can be explosive and dominant when their three-point shooting is falling. Chicago showed they can shut down opponents and win convincingly when their defense is locked in.
The chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats clearly show that no game between these two teams is guaranteed. Kyle Kuzma’s 31-point masterpiece in Game 1 and Collin Sexton’s efficient 22-point night in Game 2 both remind you that individual performances can completely change a game’s outcome. The depth charts on both sides mean roster management and adjustments matter enormously.
If you enjoyed this breakdown, share it with a friend who loves NBA basketball. Which performance impressed you the most across both games? Drop your thoughts and let’s talk hoops.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Who won the Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks games in the 2025-26 season?
Milwaukee won Game 1 on February 4, 2026 by a score of 131-115. Chicago won Game 2 on March 1, 2026 by a score of 120-97. Each team won one matchup.
2. Who led the Chicago Bulls in scoring across both games?
Matas Buzelis and Coby White each scored 21-22 points in Game 1. Collin Sexton led Chicago with 22 points in Game 2. Sexton was the most efficient scorer across both games.
3. Who was the top performer in the chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats overall?
Kyle Kuzma’s 31-point, 10-rebound, 6-assist performance in Game 1 stands as the single best individual game across both matchups. Leonard Miller’s efficiency in Game 2 with a 163.7 offensive rating is also remarkable.
4. How did Milwaukee shoot from three-point range in both games?
Milwaukee shot 60.5% from three in Game 1, making 23 of 38 attempts. They dropped to just 28.3% in Game 2, making only 13 of 46 attempts. That variance was a major factor in the different outcomes.
5. Which Chicago Bulls player improved the most between the two games?
Collin Sexton was not a major factor in Game 1 but emerged as Chicago’s best scorer in Game 2 with 22 points on 64.3% shooting. His improvement was the biggest individual story across both chicago bulls vs milwaukee bucks match player stats sheets.
6. How many points did Chicago score off turnovers in their win?
Chicago scored 20 points off turnovers in Game 2, compared to Milwaukee’s 14. Their 14 steals created multiple easy transition opportunities that directly contributed to their blowout fourth quarter.
7. What was Milwaukee’s biggest lead in Game 1?
Milwaukee’s biggest lead in Game 1 was 26 points. That kind of lead cushion allowed them to manage the game comfortably in the fourth quarter even as Chicago mounted a partial comeback.
8. How did the bench units perform in both games?
In Game 1, Milwaukee’s bench outscored Chicago’s bench 45 to 30. In Game 2, Chicago’s bench narrowly won the bench battle 48 to 45. The Bulls’ improved bench depth was a meaningful factor in their Game 2 victory.
9. Which Bucks player struggled the most in Chicago’s Game 2 win?
Kevin Porter Jr. had a very difficult night with just 10 points on 4-of-16 shooting and a minus-23 plus/minus rating. That minus-23 was the worst on the floor and reflected just how badly Milwaukee’s lineups were being outscored.
10. Are there more Chicago Bulls vs Milwaukee Bucks games this season?
You should check the NBA official schedule for any remaining matchups. Both teams have been competitive this season and any future game between them promises to be entertaining given how evenly matched they have proven to be.
Also read Newsbeverage.com
Email: johanharwen314@gmail.com
Author Name: Johan Harwen
About the Author: Johan Harwen is a passionate NBA analyst and sports writer with over a decade of experience covering professional basketball. He specializes in game breakdowns, player performance analysis, and statistical deep-dives that help fans understand the game at a deeper level. Johan has covered multiple NBA seasons and brings a sharp eye for detail combined with a conversational writing style that makes complex stats easy for every fan to enjoy. When he is not writing about basketball, Johan enjoys coaching youth sports and following international leagues.
